Immigrants from Australia vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,347,871 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 28.7 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $39,372, a difference of 47.2%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $49,215, a difference of 37.4%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $92,231, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $53,275, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and median female earnings ($46,573 compared to $36,904, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 76.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 52.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 42.2%), births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 37.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.0%), currently married (47.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.36, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 43.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 86.8%), professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 75.3%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%).