Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,661,838 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,531 compared to $39,372, a difference of 18.2%), median male earnings ($58,008 compared to $49,215, a difference of 17.9%), and median family income ($108,161 compared to $92,231, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,275, a difference of 0.17%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and median household income ($90,026 compared to $79,737, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 24.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 30.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.2%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.0%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.1%).