Latvian vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,195,780 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.065% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 65.1 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,372, a difference of 33.7%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $92,231, a difference of 30.4%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $49,215, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,275, a difference of 0.93%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $36,904, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 77.0%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 71.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.0%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 6.0%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households (62.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 90.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 71.8%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%).