Russian vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,306,669 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.706. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 31.4 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $39,372, a difference of 35.0%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $92,231, a difference of 30.6%), and median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $49,215, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $53,275, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $36,904, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 67.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 54.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.72%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.7%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.3%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 76.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.1%), and professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.37%).