Australian vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,321,678 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 173.7 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $39,372, a difference of 32.3%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $92,231, a difference of 28.4%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $49,215, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $53,275, a difference of 0.87%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $36,904, a difference of 17.3%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 67.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 55.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.0%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 23.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.8%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and family households (62.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 81.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.8%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%).