Immigrants from Latin America vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,461,488 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to an increase of 85.6 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,823 compared to $39,372, a difference of 6.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $87,751, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $92,554, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $54,474, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $53,275, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.19%), currently married (43.8% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (44.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.64%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.6%).