Indian (Asian) vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,189,465 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $39,372, a difference of 36.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $87,751, a difference of 36.2%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $92,231, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $53,275, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $36,904, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 67.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 41.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (65.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 94.0%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 65.6%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.66%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.7%).