Immigrants from Fiji vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,015,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $85,066, a difference of 22.2%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $78,166, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $90,811, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $51,783, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and per capita income ($42,694 compared to $37,407, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.43, a difference of 0.75%), family households (68.8% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (33.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 3rd grade (96.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.2%).