Immigrants from Europe vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,726,500 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,950 compared to $37,407, a difference of 36.2%), median male earnings ($62,057 compared to $47,990, a difference of 29.3%), and median family income ($115,523 compared to $90,918, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $51,783, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $56,089, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.4%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 37.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.8%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (63.7% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 46.9%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 72.5%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 67.6%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.2%).