Indian (Asian) vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,191,767 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $37,407, a difference of 44.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $85,066, a difference of 40.5%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $90,918, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $51,783, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $56,089, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 47.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 47.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 44.3%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.43, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 110.5%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 99.7%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.78%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 36.0%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.2%).