Fijian vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,477,081 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 53.7 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $90,811, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $85,066, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $56,089, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $35,629, a difference of 1.5%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $37,407, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.15%), single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.58%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 10.8%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.29%), family households (65.9% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.43, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.5%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).