Immigrants from Belgium vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,000,342 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 68.6 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $37,407, a difference of 47.2%), median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $47,990, a difference of 37.8%), and median family income ($123,831 compared to $90,918, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $51,783, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $56,089, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 43.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.1%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.45%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.4%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (63.0% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 44.6%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 112.8%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 109.1%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 84.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.51%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.1%).