Immigrants from Belarus vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,719,991 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 11.8 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $37,407, a difference of 34.5%), median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $47,990, a difference of 30.6%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $41,719, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $51,783, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $56,089, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 31.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 29.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.5%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 39.4%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.7%), family households (63.7% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 84.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 77.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 49.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 69.4%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 68.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.74%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.8%).