Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Mexican American Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Mexican American Indians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,555
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
301st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Mexican American Indian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,463,080 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 58.5 Mexican American Indians.
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,783, a difference of 15.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $78,166, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $90,811, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,990, a difference of 0.33%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $37,407, a difference of 2.6%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,719, a difference of 2.6%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,407 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $90,918 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $78,166 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,719 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $47,990 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $35,629 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Fair $51,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $85,066 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $90,811 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $56,089 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.9%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 23.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Fair 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Fair 36.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.7% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.43, a difference of 7.5%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.43 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 35.7% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 88.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.51%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 92.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 92.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 90.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 89.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 87.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 85.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 83.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 79.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 58.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 51.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 38.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.3%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Fair 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Fair 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |