Immigrants from Ireland vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,436,405 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Ireland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ireland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ireland corresponds to an increase of 85.0 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,584 compared to $37,407, a difference of 51.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($120,333 compared to $85,066, a difference of 41.5%), and median male earnings ($67,698 compared to $47,990, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,075 compared to $51,783, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,495 compared to $56,089, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 57.6%), family poverty (7.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 55.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.8%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.7%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 47.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.5%), family households (63.2% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 55.9%), no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 50.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 92.8%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 83.7%), and master's degree (20.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 26.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.3%).