Immigrants from Uruguay vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,230,342 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.262% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 262.4 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $37,407, a difference of 17.6%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $47,990, a difference of 10.2%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $41,719, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 0.41%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $51,783, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $56,089, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 16.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.39%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.98%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 55.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 35.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.7%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.88%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.2%).