Immigrants from Cuba vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,057,166 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $56,089, a difference of 25.4%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $90,918, a difference of 16.2%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $78,166, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $51,783, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $35,629, a difference of 7.0%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $37,407, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 51.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 46.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.25%), male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 26.6%), births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (43.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 48.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.39%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.5%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.25%), disability (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.9%).