Immigrants from Brazil vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,184,711 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 16.0 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $37,407, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $47,990, a difference of 21.5%), and median family income ($109,418 compared to $90,918, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $51,783, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $56,089, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 29.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.49%), married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 60.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 35.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 62.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.4%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 19.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.7%).