Latvian vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,021,548 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.417% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 416.9 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,407, a difference of 40.7%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $90,918, a difference of 32.3%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $47,990, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,783, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $56,089, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 64.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 53.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.4%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 39.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.7%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households (62.8% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 37.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 106.7%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 91.2%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 23.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%).