Immigrants from Hungary vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,186,673 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.165% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to an increase of 164.6 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,303 compared to $37,407, a difference of 31.8%), median male earnings ($59,806 compared to $47,990, a difference of 24.6%), and median family income ($111,378 compared to $90,918, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $51,783, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,277 compared to $56,089, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.4%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.70%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (63.6% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 44.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.1%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.5%).