Czech vs Egyptian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Egyptian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Egyptians

Excellent
Excellent
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Egyptian Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,990,089 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Egyptians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Egyptians.
Czech Integration in Egyptian Communities

Czech vs Egyptian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $43,305, a difference of 11.1%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $95,673, a difference of 11.0%), and wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $54,444, a difference of 5.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $65,441, a difference of 6.9%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $114,119, a difference of 7.8%).
Czech vs Egyptian Income
Income MetricCzechEgyptian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Exceptional
$48,358
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Exceptional
$114,119
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Exceptional
$95,673
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Exceptional
$51,701
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Exceptional
$61,095
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Exceptional
$43,305
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Exceptional
$54,444
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Exceptional
$105,282
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Exceptional
$112,256
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Exceptional
$65,441
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Poor
26.6%

Czech vs Egyptian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.5%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Czech vs Egyptian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechEgyptian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.0%

Czech vs Egyptian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Czech vs Egyptian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechEgyptian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Czech vs Egyptian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.56%).
Czech vs Egyptian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechEgyptian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
83.5%

Czech vs Egyptian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.0%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Czech vs Egyptian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechEgyptian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Exceptional
28.2%

Czech vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 72.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.6%).
Czech vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechEgyptian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.1%

Czech vs Egyptian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%).
Czech vs Egyptian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechEgyptian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
63.1%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Exceptional
17.6%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%

Czech vs Egyptian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Czech vs Egyptian Disability
Disability MetricCzechEgyptian
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%