Czech vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Serbians

Excellent
Excellent
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,972,276 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 76.5 Serbians.
Czech Integration in Serbian Communities

Czech vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.4%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $46,551, a difference of 4.4%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $40,539, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $103,522, a difference of 0.010%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $61,087, a difference of 0.26%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,106, a difference of 0.62%).
Czech vs Serbian Income
Income MetricCzechSerbian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
27.7%

Czech vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.59%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Czech vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechSerbian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.3%

Czech vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Czech vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechSerbian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Czech vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.28%).
Czech vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Czech vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.7%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.39%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.78%).
Czech vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechSerbian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Good
30.7%

Czech vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.0%).
Czech vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Poor
6.0%

Czech vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.0%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Czech vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Excellent
2.0%

Czech vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.0%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.65%), disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Czech vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricCzechSerbian
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Good
12.1%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%