Czech vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,362,714 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 173.8 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 59.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $90,186, a difference of 14.8%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $92,513, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,221 compared to $45,204, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $40,773, a difference of 4.6%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $80,324, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 83.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 65.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.24%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 65.7%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 58.7%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 60.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 33.9%), currently married (49.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 328.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 116.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 100.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 32.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 75.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 100.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 109.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.9%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 48.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.79%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.2%).