Czech vs Maltese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,200,400 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 31.2 Maltese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $110,064, a difference of 14.0%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $97,015, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $62,953, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $53,735, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $66,027, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.8%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.0%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.41%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 17.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (91.6% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 11th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.1%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.16%), female disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.43%).