Czech vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,433,780 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.572. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 58.0 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $49,448, a difference of 10.9%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $115,395, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $105,223, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $53,552, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $65,209, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.17%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 22.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.0%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.17%).