Czech vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,552,716 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.214% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 214.2 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $57,953, a difference of 29.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $115,947, a difference of 20.1%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $126,620, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $56,660, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $69,164, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.68%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.54%), family households (64.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 100.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 57.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.4%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.38%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.5%).