Czech vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,142,981 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 46.5 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 80.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $85,552, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $50,747, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,221 compared to $45,596, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $54,538, a difference of 6.1%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $41,932, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 92.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 81.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 75.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.49%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 67.4%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 66.9%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 71.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.4%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.34, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 444.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 168.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 147.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 48.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 114.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 147.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 84.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.7%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 64.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), female disability (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.8%).