Czech vs Dutch Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,970,139 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Dutch within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Dutch. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Dutch.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $42,605, a difference of 4.7%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $101,192, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $37,339, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,265, a difference of 0.30%), wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $59,539, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.55%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 8.4%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 4.1%).