Czech vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,286,212 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 9.3 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $51,731, a difference of 16.0%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $45,014, a difference of 15.4%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $53,386, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $55,571, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $66,892, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $114,342, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.9%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.5%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (64.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 58.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.1%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.98%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.1%).