Czech vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,983,463 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 9.8 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 43.1%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $83,319, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $48,535, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $50,757, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $36,414, a difference of 7.1%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $41,119, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 112.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 83.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.7%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.9%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 39.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 48.3%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.33, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 185.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 65.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 15.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 39.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 54.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 94.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%).