Czech vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,754,394 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 17.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $94,288, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $55,986, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $38,886, a difference of 0.27%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $50,565, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $45,600, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 23.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.5%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 44.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.59%), disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%).