Czech vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,765,943 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $85,787, a difference of 20.7%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $88,556, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $82,152, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $47,518, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $35,661, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $54,922, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 49.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.5%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.25%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 48.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.1%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.3%).