Czech vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Zimbabweans
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,272,181 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 9.7 Zimbabweans.
Czech vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $65,854, a difference of 7.5%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $90,618, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.32%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.43%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $48,229, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Czech | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Fair 26.3% |
Czech vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.7%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czech vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.52%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Czech vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Czech vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.4%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Czech vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.4% |
Czech vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.4%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czech vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |