Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Immigrants from Ecuador

Excellent
Poor
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,970,865 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 131.5 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Czech Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 29.8%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $92,837, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $54,030, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $38,644, a difference of 0.90%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $53,722, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $44,462, a difference of 6.2%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricCzechImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
22.5%

Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 67.8%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 63.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.1%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.5%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
15.0%

Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 44.9%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.2%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.6%

Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 40.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
82.2%

Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.0%), currently married (49.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.80%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
33.7%

Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 246.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 22.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 51.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 68.0%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.2%

Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 106.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricCzechImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%