Czech vs Icelander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Icelander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Icelanders
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Icelander Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,948,982 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.769. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 104.8 Icelanders.
Czech vs Icelander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 6.2%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $55,415, a difference of 2.0%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $104,282, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $61,270, a difference of 0.040%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $39,109, a difference of 0.30%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,247, a difference of 0.34%).
Income Metric | Czech | Icelander |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Excellent $44,987 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Good $104,282 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Good $85,797 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Good $46,916 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Good $55,415 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Fair $39,109 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Tragic $51,247 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Good $95,560 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Good $102,261 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Average $61,270 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Tragic 27.5% |
Czech vs Icelander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.2%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Icelander |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Good 11.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 13.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Fair 29.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Czech vs Icelander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.9%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.6%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Icelander |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Czech vs Icelander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.98%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Icelander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 40.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Average 82.8% |
Czech vs Icelander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.0%), currently married (49.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Icelander |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Excellent 30.3% |
Czech vs Icelander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 39.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Icelander |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 90.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 58.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czech vs Icelander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.9%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Icelander |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Exceptional 90.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Excellent 39.5% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Czech vs Icelander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.67%), female disability (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.92%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Icelander |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Excellent 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |