Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Immigrants from the Azores

Excellent
Poor
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,059,459 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 65.1 Immigrants from the Azores.
Czech Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $52,121, a difference of 17.5%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $39,608, a difference of 12.6%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $95,402, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $38,573, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $52,621, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $45,812, a difference of 3.1%).
Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Income
Income MetricCzechImmigrants from the Azores
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Tragic
$39,608
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Tragic
$95,402
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Tragic
$80,357
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Fair
$45,812
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Fair
$53,503
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Good
$52,621
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Fair
$92,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Tragic
$94,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Tragic
$52,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
27.2%

Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 77.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 11.5%).
Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechImmigrants from the Azores
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
32.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
16.4%

Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.9%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 41.8%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.3%).
Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechImmigrants from the Azores
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%

Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechImmigrants from the Azores
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
80.1%

Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.5%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechImmigrants from the Azores
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
45.1%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
39.6%

Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 40.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechImmigrants from the Azores
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Excellent
56.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.5%

Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 103.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 54.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechImmigrants from the Azores
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
94.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
93.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
92.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
90.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
89.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
87.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
85.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
82.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
78.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
54.7%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
48.4%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Tragic
35.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 11.5%).
Czech vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability
Disability MetricCzechImmigrants from the Azores
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
50.9%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%