Czech vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,393,374 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 101.1 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $76,903, a difference of 34.6%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $79,563, a difference of 33.0%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $42,581, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $47,907, a difference of 7.3%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $33,894, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $51,719, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 86.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 76.9%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.41%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 141.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 83.1%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 82.0%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 67.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.38%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 71.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 47.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 44.6%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 40.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.3%).