Czech vs Osage Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Osage
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Osage
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Osage Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,749,824 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.609. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 22.3 Osage.
Czech vs Osage Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $88,390, a difference of 17.1%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $91,926, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $75,240, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $36,034, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $55,677, a difference of 10.0%).
Income Metric | Czech | Osage |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Tragic $39,568 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Tragic $91,926 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Tragic $75,240 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Tragic $42,651 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Tragic $50,292 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Tragic $36,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Tragic $45,764 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Tragic $84,461 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Tragic $88,390 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Tragic $55,677 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Czech vs Osage Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.4%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.9%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 12.9%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Osage |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 17.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 24.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Tragic 32.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Average 11.7% |
Czech vs Osage Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Osage |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Czech vs Osage Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Osage |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 63.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 39.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 80.6% |
Czech vs Osage Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.38%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Osage |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Average 6.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Excellent 47.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Fair 32.1% |
Czech vs Osage Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Osage |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 58.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czech vs Osage Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.2%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Osage |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 84.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Tragic 33.0% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.7% |
Czech vs Osage Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 28.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.1%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Osage |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 27.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |