Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Excellent
Excellent
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,414,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.226% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 225.9 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Czech Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Difference between Czech Ancestry and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

While Czech ancestry and immigrants from Czechoslovakia may have similarities, there are subtle differences that set them apart.

Czech Ancestry

Czech ancestry refers to a person's genetic, cultural, and historical connection to Czechoslovakia through their family lineage. This means that the person has Czech heritage and is likely to share some characteristics and cultural traits that are associated with Czechoslovakia, such as language, customs, and traditions. It is possible to have Czech ancestry without being an immigrant from Czechoslovakia.

Immigrant from Czechoslovakia

On the other hand, an immigrant from Czechoslovakia is a person who has moved from Czechoslovakia to the United States, with the intention of settling there. This person has left their country of origin and has become a citizen or resident of the United States. An immigrant from Czechoslovakia may or may not have Czech ancestry, and their cultural background and identity may be influenced by a combination of their Czech heritage and the culture of the United States.

Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $51,770, a difference of 16.1%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $43,571, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $52,361, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $54,352, a difference of 5.7%), wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $111,914, a difference of 8.1%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricCzechImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
27.3%

Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.0%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.77%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.6%

Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.2%

Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.59%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.9%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Exceptional
28.4%

Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 71.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.8%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.1%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.4%

Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricCzechImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%