Czech vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,529,064 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 47.2 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $55,082, a difference of 23.5%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $123,831, a difference of 17.0%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $66,125, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.46%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $54,830, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $69,703, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.7%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 71.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 58.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 53.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.74%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%).