Czech vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Potawatomi

Excellent
Fair
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,456,118 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 83.1 Potawatomi.
Czech Integration in Potawatomi Communities

Czech vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $84,613, a difference of 22.3%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $88,265, a difference of 19.9%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $72,576, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $46,462, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $34,739, a difference of 12.2%).
Czech vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricCzechPotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
27.7%

Czech vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 37.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 16.1%).
Czech vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechPotawatomi
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Poor
12.5%

Czech vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%).
Czech vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechPotawatomi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Czech vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Czech vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechPotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
80.0%

Czech vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.8%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Czech vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechPotawatomi
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
36.2%

Czech vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Czech vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechPotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.3%

Czech vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.8%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Czech vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechPotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Czech vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.2%).
Czech vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricCzechPotawatomi
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%