Czech vs Paiute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,748,705 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Paiute within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.504% in Paiute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 503.9 Paiute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $82,629, a difference of 25.3%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $85,414, a difference of 23.9%), and per capita income ($44,595 compared to $37,066, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,743, a difference of 0.63%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $36,056, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $41,508, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 106.2%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 75.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 14.1%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 96.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 70.5%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 42.3%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 39.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 71.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 5.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 58.7%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 40.4%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 152.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.8%).