Czech vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,226,401 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 23.3 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $74,815, a difference of 38.4%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $80,885, a difference of 30.8%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $65,914, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $34,074, a difference of 14.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $44,733, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $51,140, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 67.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 65.3%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 65.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 63.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 41.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.27, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 67.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.9%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.0%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 54.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 14.2%).