Czech vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 372,725,964 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 20.7 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.9%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $41,375, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($44,595 compared to $46,876, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $52,190, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $62,645, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $106,217, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.44%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.4%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 60.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.0%).