Czech vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,956,285 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 34.7 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 40.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $53,974, a difference of 13.5%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $51,793, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,595 compared to $44,552, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $94,867, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $46,094, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 76.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 68.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 61.2%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 61.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 50.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 17.1%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.35, a difference of 7.7%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 53.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 124.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and high school diploma (91.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.42%), college, 1 year or more (60.6% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.76%, a difference of 105.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 82.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%), disability (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.9%).