Czech vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 423,810,359 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 18.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $57,930, a difference of 12.7%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $93,899, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $55,809, a difference of 1.3%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $44,000, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $48,266, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and poverty (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.1%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.0%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.11 compared to 3.37, a difference of 8.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and family households (64.5% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.4% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.19%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 24.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.0%).