Czech vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,203,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 22.0 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 33.6%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $43,243, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $64,989, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $103,736, a difference of 0.22%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $96,824, a difference of 0.31%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $56,243, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.9%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 25.3%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.3%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.0%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.31%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.2%).