Czech vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,943,831 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 13.5 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $118,056, a difference of 22.3%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $104,796, a difference of 21.6%), and per capita income ($44,595 compared to $53,806, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $57,123, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $69,872, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 36.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.47%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 96.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 58.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 51.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.5%).