Czech vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 379,063,692 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 20.3 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $47,698, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $64,658, a difference of 5.6%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $90,446, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,678, a difference of 0.50%), wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $48,887, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and male poverty (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.88%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.90%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.71%).