Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Immigrants from Thailand

Excellent
Fair
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,768,514 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 18.6 Immigrants from Thailand.
Czech Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 18.9%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $52,908, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $97,400, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $38,810, a difference of 0.47%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $50,645, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $60,217, a difference of 1.7%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Income
Income MetricCzechImmigrants from Thailand
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Poor
$42,289
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Poor
$99,840
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Fair
$83,327
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Fair
$45,598
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Poor
$52,908
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Poor
$38,810
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Tragic
$50,645
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Poor
$91,337
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Poor
$97,400
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Fair
$60,217
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
24.5%

Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.6%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechImmigrants from Thailand
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Poor
12.4%

Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.9%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechImmigrants from Thailand
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
5.4%

Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechImmigrants from Thailand
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
81.9%

Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.5%), currently married (49.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechImmigrants from Thailand
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
45.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Poor
32.8%

Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.6%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechImmigrants from Thailand
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
6.9%

Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 81.0%), associate's degree (47.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechImmigrants from Thailand
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
84.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Fair
64.7%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability
Disability MetricCzechImmigrants from Thailand
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
24.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%